Akasha extradition turning against the State

Ibrahim Akasha, Gulam Hussein, Vijay Goswami and Baktash Akasha at the High Court in Mombasa on Tuesday / MKAMBURI MWAWASI
Ibrahim Akasha, Gulam Hussein, Vijay Goswami and Baktash Akasha at the High Court in Mombasa on Tuesday / MKAMBURI MWAWASI

The state has suffered a second setback

in the extradition case of two sons of

slain drug baron Ibrahim Akasha and

two foreigners to the US.

A chief magistrate’s court in Mombasa

has ruled that the state has to produce

live witnesses, which the Office of the

Director of Public Prosecutions is reluctant

to do.

Assistant DPP Alexander Muteti told

the court on two occasions they will not

need live witnesses. He said he closed

his case and will not call live witnesses.

Baktash Akasha, Ibrahim Akasha,

Gulam Hussein and Vijaygiri Goswami

are wanted in the US for drug trafficking.

Chief magistrate Julius Nang’ea said

the proceedings will not continue without

the eight witnesses mentioned in

the affidavits produced by United States

prosecutors.

On December 1, Muteti told the court

they will use an affidavit sworn by officers

from the US. Defence lawyers Cliff

Ombeta and Kirathe Wandugi had made

an application for the state to produce

all the witnesses who had sworn the

affidavit.

Among those who will be cross-examined

are American chief investigator

Michael Lockhard, a prosecutor in the

New York court Mathew Kellow and six

confidential sources.

In November 2014, warrants of arrest

were issued by a US court for the four

over a drug trafficking case. They are

required to answer a narcotics importation

conspiracy charge.

The four were arrested by anti-narcotics

police officers at the Akashashome in Nyali.

Copies of the arrest warrants in the

Southern District of New York were

attached to an application by Muteti.

Ombeta said since the DPP has already

closed their case, it will be their chance

to cross-examine the witnesses.


WATCH: The latest videos from the Star