CALL FOR AUDIT

Senators probe alleged graft at West Kano Irrigation Scheme

Petitioners want the Senate committee to carry out thorough financial scrutiny of the scheme between 2007-2021

In Summary

• The petitioners also pleaded with the Murango-led committee to recommend a forensic audit of all the officials involved in the management of the scheme between 2007-2021.

• They also want the committee to help set up a team of experts to identify and establish gaps in the current scheme management system.

Senate Agriculture Committee chairman James Murango during a meeting of the panel in Parliament on Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Senate Agriculture Committee chairman James Murango during a meeting of the panel in Parliament on Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Image: JULIUS OTIENO

A Senate committee has started investigations into alleged graft at the West Kano Rice Irrigation Scheme in Kisumu county.

The probe follows a petition claiming massive embezzlement of the farmers’ money by the management of the scheme.

Petitioner Patrick Ochieng appeared before the Agriculture committee chaired by Kirinyaga Senator James Murango probing the claim on Tuesday.

He told the panel that the scheme has received millions of shillings from the government in the form of rehabilitation fund, economic stimulus package fund, farmers savings fund and rice sales funds.

“All these funds have been misappropriated, embezzled, stolen, pilfered, snaffled under the watch of the EACC Western regional office, Kisumu,” the petition said.

Ochieng claimed that their efforts to have the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission investigate the pilferage in the scheme had failed.

“The way EACC has handled the matter is causing unbearable social, economic, physical and emotional suffering to farmers and the project beneficiaries,” Ochieng added in his petition.

As such, the petitioners want the Senate committee to carry out thorough financial scrutiny of the scheme between 2007-2021 and an institutional audit of the scheme since its inception.

The petitioners also pleaded with the Murango-led committee to recommend a forensic audit of all the officials involved in the management of the scheme between 2007-2021.

They also want the committee to help set up a team of experts to identify and establish gaps in the current scheme management system.

“We call upon the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Livestock and Fisheries to intervene to unlock the West Kano Irrigation scheme investigation process so as to bring the untouchable culprits to book,” Ochieng said.

The committee assured that it will get to the bottom of the claim to establish the truth and institute action against perpetrators.

“Anything affecting the farmers in this country is affecting food security. We will investigate all the issues affecting farmers not only in West Kano, but also in all other irrigations schemes,” Murango said.

The chairman disclosed that they will visit the scheme in Kisumu, speak to the management and farmers and summon EACC that has been accused of inaction to establish the truth.

Petitioner Patrick Ochieng when he appeared before the Senate Agriculture Committee chaired by James Murango in Parliament on Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Petitioner Patrick Ochieng when he appeared before the Senate Agriculture Committee chaired by James Murango in Parliament on Tuesday, February 21, 2023
Image: JULIUS OTIENO

The petitioners claim that between 2009-2015, the government released Sh86 million with the farmers savings totalling Sh18 million which was utilised by West Kano Irrigation Farmers Revolving (Revolving Fund) and the National Irrigation Board (NIB).

Ochieng told the Senate committee that NIB set up the irrigation farmers revolving fund organisation to carry out rice production in the scheme.

He argues that the revolving fund organisation was an umbrella body for 59 self-help groups in the whole scheme, and was meant to advance cash to farmers for transplanting, weeding and harvesting.

According to Ochieng, the revolving fund is also mandated to secure and pay for operations and maintenance, recover cash and services advanced to farmers.

“Farmers made repayment to both revolving fund office and the National Irrigation Board after which they were issued with receipts. For repayment of advances, the receipts were marked as recovery and for savings, receipts were indicated with the next cropping season,” he claims.

WATCH: The latest videos from the Star