MWAMISI: From perpetual mobilisation to purposeful development

Kenya’s development trajectory has perennially been constrained by a persistent state of political mobilisation and haggling. The country always operates in what is effectively a continuous campaign cycle, where the discipline of governance is repeatedly overshadowed by the immediacy of political positioning.

Kenyan politicians are essentially insensitive to the dire need for national development and the improvement of the amount and quality of services for the ordinary mwananchi. All they care is that the government of the day fails so that they would have clout going into the next electioneering period.

No wonder President William Ruto has remained unequivocal that his administration will not be distracted from its main focus of availing tangible development to Kenyans.

That position speaks to a deeper institutional reality: development requires consistency, technical focus and the ability to sustain momentum beyond political noise.

Across the national landscape, there is no shortage of programmes designed to unlock economic potential and improve livelihoods. Investments in strategic road corridors linking production zones to markets, the ongoing expansion of affordable housing in urban centres, the revitalisation of irrigation schemes such as Galana Kulalu and the consolidation of rail and logistics networks including the Standard Gauge Railway extension to Uganda, all signal a deliberate effort to build long term productive capacity.

These are critical projects that all and sundry should rally to support. Equally significant are the reforms in universal health coverage, the digitisation of government services and the broader bottom up economic transformation agenda aimed at integrating those historically excluded from formal economic systems.

Yet, these initiatives demand sustained administrative attention. They cannot thrive in an environment where national discourse is continually diverted towards political spectacle and episodic declarations. The opposition, for instance, pokes holes into every development initiative that appears to be happening.

The reality is that development is neither instantaneous nor performative. It is cumulative, often technical, and in many instances, invisible in its early stages. It requires feasibility assessments, structured financing, procurement discipline and careful implementation. This is why it is critical for citizens to rally around government, particularly during the implementation phase of major programmes.

This is not a call for uncritical support, but rather for informed engagement that enables delivery while holding institutions to account. A mature democracy must be capable of distinguishing between necessary scrutiny and counterproductive disruption.

At the county level, the imperative for accountability becomes even sharper. Since 2022, county governments have received substantial allocations from the Consolidated Fund, complemented by own source revenues and conditional grants.

These resources were intended to translate into tangible development outcomes at the local level. Citizens must therefore move beyond political allegiance and undertake a more rigorous evaluation of performance. What has been achieved in terms of road infrastructure, water access, healthcare delivery, agricultural support, and local enterprise development?

How effectively have counties managed public procurement processes and safeguarded public assets? To what extent have development plans been aligned with actual expenditure? These are the questions that should define civic engagement. However, Kenya’s political culture continues to exhibit a susceptibility to sensationalism.

Public attention is often captured by the anticipation of the next political announcement, the next perceived realignment, or the next moment of political theatre.

Crowds gather not necessarily to interrogate policy, but to witness alignment. This cyclical anticipation creates a form of national distraction, where long-term development priorities are repeatedly subordinated to short term political excitement. The consequence is a dilution of civic focus and a weakening of accountability mechanisms.

A shift towards a more development minded citizenry is therefore essential. This entails prioritising outcomes over rhetoric, continuity over disruption and substance over spectacle.

It also requires a recalibration of expectations, particularly among the youth. Government, by its very structure, cannot absorb the scale of labour entering the economy each year. The future of employment lies in enterprise, innovation and the expansion of productive sectors.

Young people must increasingly position themselves not only as job seekers, but as creators of economic value, capable of leveraging opportunities in agriculture, manufacturing, digital services and the creative economy.

This transition places a corresponding obligation on the private sector. No economy has achieved sustained growth without a vibrant and expanding private sector. Businesses must therefore take a more proactive role in job creation, skills development and investment in value chains that generate employment at scale.

At the same time, government must more deliberately place the private sector under obligation to deliver on employment outcomes. Through a combination of incentives, regulatory clarity and structured partnerships, the state can catalyse private sector expansion while ensuring growth translates into opportunities for the youth.

Beyond production and employment, there is also the question of financial discipline at both household and national levels. The global economic environment remains uncertain, with geopolitical tensions, including the risk of escalation involving the United States and Iran, posing significant implications for the petroleum sector.

Any disruption in global oil supply would inevitably trigger increases in fuel prices, with cascading effects across transport, manufacturing, food systems, and the overall cost of living. Kenya, as a net importer of petroleum products, remains particularly exposed to such external shocks.

In this context, prudence is not optional. Households must cultivate a stronger culture of saving and moderated consumption, while institutions must exercise discipline in expenditure and investment decisions. Economic resilience is built not only through large scale infrastructure, but also through the everyday financial choices of citizens and enterprises.

Ultimately, Kenya stands at a critical juncture. The foundations for transformation are present, but their realisation depends on a collective shift in orientation.

Moving from perpetual political mobilisation to purposeful development will require leadership that remains focused, institutions that are disciplined, a private sector that is dynamic and a citizenry that is informed, demanding and firmly anchored in the pursuit of long term national progress.