The problem with state corporations in the country is that
the management teams could be falsifying the data so that the government can
bail them out.
They should be allowed to die a natural death without being
subsidised through taxpayers’ cash. It is only through this that each firm will
want to stand on its own.
But when we keep subsidising them, we enhance mediocrity and
inefficiency.
We should not encourage them to be supported by the government
using taxpayers' money. After all, if you are in business, why can’t you stand
on your own?
In any case, to say the least, look at Kenya Airways. Year
in year out it is being subsidised by the government, yet it is one firm that
should be making a profit.
The catchword here is inefficiency in both operational and
other managerial aspects. There is also the situation of people being awarded
senior positions to manage the entity, yet they don’t merit or qualify. How do
we expect a different end result other than loss-making?
The government in the reform plan should cultivate ways of
making these entities more profitable through subcontracting the management. It
should be done in a way that if you don’t meet your targets, you are shown the
door.
If you can meet the same, you are encouraged to move further
and serve another period. Contracting has proven to be an efficient tool for
achieving excellence in performance.
We have seen the government take some measures like
privatisation. While it is one sure way of moving forward, we must not
privatise privately. It must be through public bidding and amid an enhanced
high level of transparency and accountability.
The question of picking an entity that is tipped for sale
and identifying cronies to buy it at a throwaway price is unacceptable. This
process must be above board and it must be done through public participation.
UON Economics don spoke to Star