The call by the National Assembly’s Committee on Implementation of the Constitution follows the IG’s last-minute request to adjourn a scheduled meeting for 21 days, a move lawmakers interpreted as a blatant snub.
The committee has now ordered him to present himself on September 16.
Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja
A House committee has issued direct summons to Inspector
General of Police Douglas Kanja, demanding he personally appear before them to
explain the conflict pitting the service and the commission mandated to
superintend it.
The MPs said the escalating and “deliberate” institutional
conflict that is crippling the National Police Service Commission (NPSC) and
stalling critical reforms has to be put to a close.
The call by the National Assembly’s Committee on Implementation
of the Constitution follows the IG’s last-minute request to adjourn a scheduled
meeting for 21 days, a move lawmakers interpreted as a blatant snub.
The committee has now ordered him to present himself on
September 16.
Led by Suba South MP Caroli Omondi, the legislators
expressed frustration that the standoff between the police command and its
constitutional oversight body has persisted for nearly 15 years since the current
constitution was promulgated.
The situation has left issues like payroll management and
operational efficiency in disarray.
“This conflict is what we intend to address,” said Nambale
MP Geoffrey Mulanya, capturing the committee’s fury.
“We take exception that the office of the IG has avoided
appearing, yet this conflict persists. The creators of the constitution knew
what they were doing. There is a deliberate effort for the uniformed officers
to frustrate the effort of the NPSC,” the MP said.
The NPSC and the national police service have a dispute over
their powers. Before the 2010 Constitution, the police commissioner wielded
absolute control.
The new law intentionally split this authority, creating the
NPSC to handle human resources, including appointments, promotions and
discipline.
The constitution mandates the IG as responsible for
operational command, a delicate balance that has been a source of friction ever
since.
MPs revealed that the NPSC has complained that the IG and
his deputies have consistently failed to honour meetings, thereby denying the
commission the quorum needed to conduct its business.
This obstruction has staged consequences, stalling vital
reforms and creating administrative chaos, recently flagged by the Office of
the Auditor General in a review of the commission’s books.
“When we start on a wrong footing with the IG seeking an
adjournment of 21 days, we can't move. We want to know why police reforms are
dragging,” Omondi said, underscoring the urgency of the matter.
The frustration was shared across the committee. Igembe
Central MP Daniel Kariithi expressed bewilderment that the feud has continued
under a new IG and a newly appointed NPSC chairman Amani Yuda Komora, who was
named in late August.
“We have a new commission and a new IG. I don't see why we
should have a problem with them meeting,” Kariithi said.
“The former IG and commission had differences which we
believed wouldn't play out now. The commission should be ready to serve Kenyans
openly.”
Nandi Hills MP Bernard Kitur issued a direct warning to IG
Koome, urging him not to “fall into the trap of what has been happening in the
past.”
He emphasised the seriousness with which Parliament views
the impasse, saying, “We had to come from our constituencies to be here… The
fact that there is a row means we must resolve it. There are many benefits that
will accrue if we resolve this conflict once and for all.”
Kajiado West MP George Sunkuiya acknowledged the sensitivity
of the issue and advised the committee to wait for the new meeting date before
deciding on further action.
Nominated MP Umi Harun sought to ease tensions, saying, “The
committee doesn’t bite, we just want answers for the people we represent.”
She said the IG’s request for an adjournment came too late
on the day of the meeting, leaving the legislators in a difficult position.
“We have people we are answerable to, and the public wants
to know the answers. We have come so far as a country, and we need to allow
oversight to be done without any conflict.”
Beyond the internal conflict pitting the police, the
committee also plans to engage the Independent Electoral and Boundaries
Commission on preparedness for the 2027 polls.
INSTANT ANALYSIS
The September 16 meeting is now poised to be a critical
showdown. Parliament has drawn a line, demanding accountability from the
country’s top police chief and a definitive end to a 15-year-old feud that
continues to undermine the very foundations of police reform and constitutional
governance.