BACK LOG

This is our plan to clear pending cases - Amadi

In Summary

• The Judiciary Case Load Report by the Directorate of Performance Management shows as of June 2018, there were 549,556 pending cases countrywide.

•The Constitution endorsed Alternative Dispute Resolution as a legal alternative to court proceedings to hasten dispute resolutions, while ensuring relations between disputants remain amicable.

The Judiciary.
The Judiciary.
Image: FILE

As part of the Judiciary transformation process for speedier and more efficient service delivery, we has put in place measures to effectively deal with the age-old problem of case backlogs.

Among these measures include recruitment of more judicial officers and staff, building and refurbishment of more courts, adoption of modern management practices, including but not limited to leveraging ICT in case management and processes.

The Judiciary has also carried out special initiatives such as service weeks where categorised cases are heard and concluded within the period.

CASE LOAD REPORT ON BACKLOG

The Judiciary Case Load Report by the Directorate of Performance Management shows as of June 2018, there were 549,556 pending cases countrywide.

From these figures, there is no denying the work ahead in resolving backlog of cases remains monumental, at least for the time being.

One of the biggest contributors to the backlog is the adversarial nature of our judicial system, which also leaves severely damaged relationships after the long tortuous court process.

The Constitution endorsed Alternative Dispute Resolution as a legal alternative to court proceedings to hasten dispute resolutions, while ensuring relations between disputants remain amicable.

Article 159 (2(c) of the Constitution encourages courts to use alternative forms of dispute resolution. It provides: “Alternative forms of dispute resolution including   reconciliation, mediation, arbitration and traditional dispute resolution mechanisms shall be promoted, subject to clause (3).”

It is on the above premise that the Judiciary has pegged its move and emphasis to Alternative Dispute Resolution.

Court annexed mediation was introduced on a pilot basis at the Family and Commercial Divisions of the High Court. The choice of the two divisions was deliberate. The cases in Commercial Division are worth billions of shillings, which if resolved expeditiously, would release substantial resources into the economy.

On the other hand, there is the Family Division, in which disagreements tear families apart as generations fight over wealth. The legal fights sometimes drag on for decades and generations to the extent that by the time the dispute is resolved, none of the original parties is alive.

BENEFITS TO PARTIES

Mediation has many benefits to all parties. Among these benefits are enhanced access to justice for all, reduction of case backlog, speedy resolution of disputes, reduced cost, s an atmosphere of accommodation and tolerance and resolutions suited to parties’ needs.

It also promotes voluntary compliance of parties with resolutions, restores pre-dispute relationships, builds confidence in speedy resolution of commercial disputes, thereby improving the country’s attractiveness as an ideal place for direct foreign investments.

Indeed, the implementation of Court-Annexed Mediation has contributed to Kenya’s ranking in ease doing business. A World Bank report ranked Kenya third in sub-Saharan Africa in the 2018 World Bank Ease of Business Index, moving up 19 places from 80 in 2017 and 92 in 2016.

Equally significant, the time for settling a dispute has reduced from an average of 50 months in Commercial and Tax Division and 43 months in Family Division respectively to an average of 66 days, according to Judiciary’s Case Audit and Institutional Capacity Survey.

Mediation has greatly contributed to restoration of relationships. Since its inception, 230 strained family relationships have been restored by resolution of cases in the Children’s Court and Family Division. During the Mediation Settlement week, a Children’s Case was settled within an hour and a relationship that had been strained owing to the court battle was restored.

Borrowing from the lessons learnt during the pilot and the settlement week, Chief Justice David Maraga gazetted Practice Directions to guide the roll out of Court Annexed Mediation to 10 counties of Mombasa, Eldoret, Kisumu, Nakuru, Nyeri, Machakos, Garissa, Embu, Kakamega and Kisii.

The task force gazetted to oversee the implementation of Court Annexed Mediation has launched its activities in Nyeri, Kakamega, Kisii, Kisumu, Mombasa and Nakuru.

During the launch, internal and external stakeholders who include advocates, court users committees, mediators, county leaders, media, community leaders and members of the public are sensitised and engaged on court-annexed mediation. Registries are also opened to receive mediation matters.

The Judiciary is confident that all Kenyans, foreigners doing business in Kenya and other stakeholders will use these innovative initiatives for dispute resolution so that together we can exorcise the ghosts of case backlog for an expeditiously and efficient delivery of justice for all.

The writer is the Chief Registrar of the Judiciary