WIN-WIN

Strike balance between development, protecting environment

It’s hard but development should not come at the expense of environment.

In Summary
  • Kenya can learn from Malaysia, one of the large economies in South Asia.
  • Despite rapid industrialisation and urbanisation, the issue of environmental protection was given priority.
SGR
SGR

Kenya is at an early stage of urbanisation, but by 2050 about half of the population will be living in cities. Around 27 percent of Kenyans today live in urban areas and it is estimated that the country is urbanising at about 4.3 percent a year. This growth is expected to drive up demand for housing and exert pressure on existing infrastructure.

Over the last 10 years, the government has spent approximately Sh1 trillion in modernisation and construction of road networks. This has increased the road network to more than 160,000km from less than 60,000km 10 years ago. The country will still need to invest at least Sh 1 trillion more in the next five years in new road projects and maintenance of existing roads.

Because infrastructure projects often comprise large-scale civil works, they are likely to affect natural habitats in one way or another. It is difficult for infrastructure projects to avoid some overlay with natural habitats therefore projects can only seek ways to minimise impact on the environment.

The Sh62 billion JKIA-Westlands expressway from Mlolongo to Waiyaki Way, for example, was redesigned to avoid touching Nairobi’s Uhuru Park as was previously planned.

The SGR from the Port of Mombasa to Nairobi, runs through Tsavo West National Park and Nairobi National Park. Part of the SGR was elevated to allow wildlife to pass without risk of injury. The rest is elevated on embankments, and six underpasses have been constructed to allow wildlife to cross.

The SGR engineers designed wildlife paths under the railway line to ease migration of wildlife in the areas. The adjustments did increase the overall cost of the project but it was necessary to conserve wildlife habitats for the benefit of generations to come.

It is difficult to strike a balance between development and environmental conservation. Development however should not come at the expense of the environment. The country can learn from Malaysia, one of the large economies in South Asia. The country underwent rapid development during the late 20th century and today less than one percent of Malaysian households live in extreme poverty. 

The World Bank projects Malaysia’s economy will transition from upper middle income to high income by 2024.

Despite rapid industrialisation and urbanisation, the issue of environmental protection was given priority. Malaysia still has 62.3 percent or about 20,456,000 ha (50,547,876.8 acres) of forest coverage, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization. It is recognised as one of the top 12 countries in mega-biodiversity and ranked fourth in the world for having the most tree species.

The World Bank also indicates that 96 percent of all Malaysians have access to clean cooking energy.

Kenya too can strike a balance between development and environmental conservation. We need to focus more energy on planting at least 1.8 billion seedlings needed to increase forest cover from the current 7.2 per cent to 10 per cent by 2022. Forests, due to their capacity to act as carbon sinks and by providing key environmental services, are globally recognised as critical in climate change mitigation and adaptation.

We also need to encourage Kenyans to switch to clean cooking energy as a majority still cook with firewood and kerosene, which have a negative impact on the environment.