The ruling formed part of the wider judgment delivered on
Thursday, in which a three-judge bench declared President William Ruto’s
appointment and gazettement of the seven IEBC nominees unconstitutional, but
upheld the nomination process itself.
The petitioners had challenged Edung’s nomination, citing
his previous service as Turkana County Attorney and alleged links to the State
House deputy chief of staff.
However, the court found no credible basis for
disqualification.
The bench, Judges Roselyne Aburili, John Chigiti, and Bahati
Mwamuye, ruled that the claims fell short of the legal threshold required to
disqualify a public nominee on grounds of bias.
“In the result, this court finds that the selection and
nomination of the first interested party, Erastus Edung, as chairperson of the
IEBC, has not been shown to contravene the Constitution.”
Justice Aburili delivered
the bench’s finding on the matter.
The court further rejected claims that the selection panel
ignored constitutional requirements on regional and disability representation
in his nomination.
In earlier hearings, Edung, through counsel Issa Mansur, had
argued that the petitioners failed to provide evidence proving violations of
these thresholds.
They defended his qualifications and dismissed the
accusations as politically charged and unsupported by fact.
Mansur told the court that Edung’s past role as county
attorney was a statutory position, not a political appointment.
“In Turkana, he served as county attorney. It’s created as a
statute. They serve the counties and not the governors. The petition alleges he
served under the governor. What is unconstitutional if he served as county
attorney?” he asked.
The petitioners also accused Edung of political bias due to
alleged ties with the deputy chief of staff.
But Erastus dismissed the claim as irrelevant and
speculative. “What role does the deputy chief of staff play in appointing an
IEBC chairperson? None,” he argued.
The ruling clears the way for Edung to be sworn in as the
new IEBC chair following his reappointment and regazettement.
This comes after the bench found that the nomination of
Edung and six other commissioners was procedurally sound, but President William
Ruto had acted in defiance of conservatory orders previously issued by Justice
Lawrence Mugambi when he appointed and gazetted them earlier.