Echesa set free in Sh39.5bn fake arms case

Echesa and the three other accused persons were acquitted of fraud, forgery and impersonation charges.

In Summary

•The former CS was charged alongside Daniel Omondi alias General Juma, Clifford Onyango and Kennedy Mboya with six counts of making a false document.

•Echesa was charged with conspiracy to commit a felony

Former sports cabinet secretary Rashid Echesa before court for the hearing of his fake arms case at Milimani law courts on June 22, 2021
Former sports cabinet secretary Rashid Echesa before court for the hearing of his fake arms case at Milimani law courts on June 22, 2021
Image: EZEKIEL AMING'A

Former Sports CS Rashid Echesa has been set free by a Nairobi court in the Sh39 billion fake arms scandal.

While setting him free on Friday evening, Senior Principal Magistrate Kenneth Cheruiyot acquitted him on grounds that the DPP did not avail key witnesses in the matter who included the two foreigners that were allegedly duped.

Cheruyoit ruled that there was no evidence to put the accused on their defense.

The two foreigners in the case were complainants in the case were Kozlowski Stanley Bruno, the CEO of US based ECO Advanced Technologies firm and Egyptian Mamdough Mostafa Lofty who claimed that Echesa and his co accused wanted to dupe them in the fake arms scandal.

However, the court put businessman Chrispin Odipo on his defense in one of the counts of being in possession of instruments to commit forgery.

Echesa and the three other accused persons were acquitted of fraud, forgery and impersonation charges.

Echesa was charged with Conspiracy to commit a felony, Obtaining money by face pretences, making a false document and personation.

The Prosecution had called a total of 18 witness in the case including defence PS Ibrahim Mohamed.

Others who testified the case were three Major officers from Kenya defence forces, a pilot, several officers from DCI and employee from the office of the Deputy President.

Most of the witnesses testified in camera due to the nature of the information regarding the department of defense that was confidential.

WATCH: The latest videos from the Star