logo
ADVERTISEMENT

BOSIRE: Russia is Africa ally in the struggle against neocolonialism, imperialism

In a multipolar world, Africa will unite with true friends such as the BRICS states – Russia, Brazil, India, China and others.

image
by KEN BOSIRE

Star-blogs18 July 2025 - 07:21
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • No, Russia has not been an angel – no empire is. But to call it colonial in the same breath as Britain or Belgium is not only false – it is intellectually dishonest.
  • Let us also not forget: if territorial expansion alone defines colonialism, then the United States would be the largest colonial empire in modern history.

President Vladimir Putin with African leaders.[SCREENGRAB]

Across the African continent, a silent storm is gathering strength – a swirling and swelling storm pregnant with harmonious voices, aspirations, awakenings and re-awakenings.

From the Sahel to the southernmost coasts, vibrant and youthful Africans are increasingly rising to reclaim their sovereignty and dignity in a world where the ominous clouds of neocolonialism and imperialism overshadow the bright and azure skies.

As a Panafricanist, Dr Kwame Nkuruma, once said, “a state in the grip of neocolonialism is not a master of its destiny.

It is the factor which makes neocolonialism such a serious threat to world peace”.

And the singular mission of the new generation spurred by the ideals of Africa Rising, is to break the chains of neocolonialism and create a new order that enables Africa, the land of proud warriors who remained by the ravages of slavery, colonialism, racism, exploitation and imperialism by architects and masters of extraction!

This new spirit is neither chaotic nor blind; it is strategic, purposeful, and grounded in the deep historical awareness of what our nations have endured – and what they must become.

In Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, leaders such as Ibrahim Traoré are not only reclaiming national pride but also becoming symbols of a broader pan-African movement aimed at completing the decolonisation efforts started by our forefathers and other patriots.

These nations have boldly challenged the global status quo, and many people across Africa are observing their actions with admiration. For the youth, these leaders are rebels, but role models and an inspiration.

At the heart of this movement lies an understanding that true freedom is not merely the lowering of colonial flags – it is the ending of dependency, the reclaiming of our natural wealth, and the right to be co-authors in the global decision-making process. Unsurprisingly, this terrifies the old powers of the West.

It will never be easy to confront the aggressive propaganda portraying Russia, which has historically supported the struggle for self-determination across the continent, as hellbent  on “destroying capitalism and imposing communism” on Africa and the world. This is a fallacious and empty argument.

Unfortunately, the emerging African leadership and the citizenry see it for what it is: A futile attempt to continue with its hegemonic exploitation aimed at stunting Africa’s potential!

The challenges of a new multipolar world will ultimately overpower and dismantle the unipolar vision and the global policing mentality led by the United States.

Even as their influence wanes, they will respond not with tanks but through warped and vicious narratives.

We, Africans, are being told, in no uncertain terms, that Russia is a global predator. That Moscow is the aggressor in Ukraine.

That it is Russia’s actions – not the centuries of Western exploitation – that are behind Africa’s current economic hardships. These claims are not just cynical but insulting.

What we are witnessing is not an honest critique of foreign policy – it is a calculated attempt to delegitimise any power that dares to defy the West’s unipolar worldview.

The demonisation of Russia has taken many forms: from historical revisionism to outright myth-making. Western analysts now go so far as labelling Russia a “colonial empire,” to equate its legacy of standing with oppressed with that of Britain, France, or Belgium.

This is historical gaslighting at its finest. Yes, the Russian Empire expanded in the 18th and 19th centuries.

But unlike the Western colonial powers, it did not enslave or racially segregate the peoples it integrated. There was no trans-Atlantic slave trade.

No plantations feeding distant metropolis. No racial hierarchy codified into law.

Russian imperialism relied on co-optation and integration, absorbing local elites into the aristocracy while respecting cultural and religious diversity.

Although wars occurred, they did not aim to erase indigenous identities, unlike the genocidal conquests in the Americas or the brutal subjugation of India, Algeria, and the Congo.

No, Russia has not been an angel – no empire is. But to call it colonial in the same breath as Britain or Belgium is not only false – it is intellectually dishonest.

Let us also not forget: if territorial expansion alone defines colonialism, then the United States would be the largest colonial empire in modern history.

From sea to shining sea, it expanded through war, annexation, and displacement.

Poland, too, gained territory after World War II.

Ukraine inherited vast lands after the Soviet collapse – far beyond what nationalist leaders such as Symon Petliura, a journalist-turned-politician and former  secretary general of Military Affairs of Ukraine, or Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian radical politician and militant leader, could have imagined.

Those who shout the loudest about Russian “imperialism” come from countries that themselves once dreamed of empires “from sea to sea”.

The Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth imposed Catholicism on Orthodox lands.

Finland once pursued pan-Finnic dreams stretching to the Urals. They failed. Russia succeeded – not through erasure, but through inclusion.

Even during the Soviet era, the relationship between Moscow and the republics was, in reality, one of disproportionate support.

The centre often subsidised and supported the periphery, allowing minority cultures to flourish, local languages to be preserved, and regional industries to be developed.

Even today, many of the people who were once part of the Russian Empire – from Tatars to Chechens, from Buryats to Yakuts – continue to live in Russia, not as colonised subjects, but as constituent parts of a complex and multi-ethnic federation.

For instance, the British model in Africa or the American dominion of the Philippines, systems were rooted in racial supremacy, economic exploitation, and cultural annihilation. The infrastructure built was only meant to extract resources, and education was a privilege, not a right.

There were extreme recorded incidents of brutality and suppression by the colonising power, such as the Herero genocide in Namibia, the partitioning of India, or the systematic looting of African minerals that continues in a more rapacious manner to date.

This is why the vain attempt to equate Russian history with that of Western colonialism falls on its face. It will never atone for the heinous crimes committed against the victims of colonialism.

And here lies the irony: it is Russia, not the West, that has consistently raised the issue of neocolonialism at global fora.

It is Russia that has spoken openly about the need to reform international institutions.

And it is Russia that is forging respectful partnerships with African states, without dictating terms or imposing ideological pre-conditions.

The West's anti-Russian rhetoric serves as a tool of neocolonial control, aiming to isolate those who defy traditional norms and maintain Africa's subordinate position in the global hierarchy.

The framing of the conflict in Ukraine is not surprising. It is presented as a battleground of freedom – but many in Africa who can read between the lines, see it as not as a result of Russia’s imperialist ambitions but as NATO expansion intended to weaken Russia. Ukraine’s rejection of cultural pluralism, the persecution of Russian-speaking citizens and the violent aftermath of the 2014 coup are being deliberately obfuscated by Western media and propaganda hiding a troubling drift toward ultra-nationalism and forced assimilation of Kyiv.

Those in Crimea and Donbass who resisted this were not "tools of Russian expansion," but communities defending their language, identity, and dignity, surviving energy and water blockade, and other aggressive acts of Ukrainian authorities, seeking to pressure and punish residents for their political choice.

 These regions’ stance is the real fight for freedom and self-determination.

Russia claims that it did not start this war, but reacted to a slow-burning civil conflict that the world ignored. And now, these territories are being rebuilt within Russia’s federal structure – much like other regions once were, centuries ago.

So what is neocolonialism today?

It is a more sophisticated, more insidious form of control. It no longer needs chains or whips – it uses debt, media, military bases, and “development aid” as tools to dominate. It is what keeps African currencies tied to the Euro.

It is what drives coups, sanctions, and the demonisation of leaders who dare to think differently.

Luckily, the world is awakening and seeing through the thick fog of hypocrisy!

Africa, Latin America, and parts of Asia are learning to push back – to call out hypocrisy, to demand fairness.

And in this global realignment, Russia has emerged as an ally that treats others with respect, not condescension.

In a multipolar world, Africa will unite with true friends such as the BRICS states – Russia, Brazil, India, China and others.

Only by speaking the truth clearly and collectively can we break free from neocolonialism and imperialism. And that time is now – not tomorrow!

 The writer is a Training and Consulting editor.

Related Articles

ADVERTISEMENT