logo
ADVERTISEMENT

Rights groups fault Sudan Army over alleged atrocities as military denies

Information Minister Khalid al-Aiser described them as “political blackmail and a deliberate falsification of the facts.”

image
by BOSCO MARITA

Africa16 September 2025 - 16:15
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • The statements were backed by six organisations with special consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council, supported by four international coalitions.
  • Together, they alleged that the Sudanese army was responsible for violations amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity.
Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize

UN Secretary-General António Guterres addressing members during HRC at global leaders in Geneva, Switzerland.

African and international human rights organisations have faulted the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and allied militias over alleged atrocities against civilians in Sudan.

The claims were presented at the 60th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, which runs from September 8 to October 8, through a series of 19 official statements distributed to member states and posted on the Council’s website.

The statements were backed by six organisations with special consultative status at the United Nations Economic and Social Council, supported by four international coalitions.

 Together, they alleged that the Sudanese army was responsible for violations amounting to war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The groups cited field reports, eyewitness accounts, and medical testimony pointing to the alleged use of chemical weapons in Nyala, El Fasher, and Zalingei, which left civilians with suffocation, poisoning, and burns.

They also accused the army of indiscriminate shelling, destruction of hospitals and schools, and attacks on humanitarian facilities, including UNICEF offices and World Food Programme warehouses.

Other claims included sexual violence as a weapon of war, mass executions, ethnic targeting of the Fur, Zaghawa, and Masalit communities, forced recruitment of children, and arbitrary arrests of journalists, lawyers, and activists.

The findings echo conclusions by UN investigators, who said both the SAF and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) may be responsible for atrocities, with civilian detention sites described as “slaughterhouses.”

The United States has also declared that the Sudanese army used chlorine gas during skirmishes in 2024, a determination that triggered sanctions this year.

The Sudanese government has firmly rejected the accusations.

Information Minister Khalid al-Aiser described them as “political blackmail and a deliberate falsification of the facts.”

 The Health Ministry reported that tests conducted in Khartoum since April showed “no evidence of chemical or radiological contamination,” noting there were “no abnormal deaths, mass illnesses, or symptoms indicative of chemical poisoning.”

Al-Aiser added that “this false narrative is just another attempt to mislead public opinion” and accused international actors of overlooking crimes committed by the RSF.

The government has since formed a national investigative committee, bringing together officials from the defense, health, foreign affairs, and intelligence ministries to review the allegations.

Despite the denials, the rights groups have renewed calls for an independent international investigative mechanism, referral of the situation to the International Criminal Court, targeted sanctions against military leaders, and the creation of safe humanitarian corridors.

They warned that failure to act would amount to complicity in ongoing crimes, urging the Human Rights Council and the wider international community to secure justice and protection for civilians in Sudan.

 

Related Articles