logo
ADVERTISEMENT

Koome appoints Justice Richard Mwongo to hear Mbeere North election petition

The petitioners are seeking to have the election nullified and a fresh poll conducted over alleged inconsistencies in Wamuthende’s identity.

image
by BRIAN ORUTA

News07 December 2025 - 12:18
ADVERTISEMENT

In Summary


  • In a gazette notice dated December 5, the directive assigned the matter to the Election Court presided over by Justice Richard Mwongo.
  • The petition, filed as Election Petition No. E1 of 2025, has Julieta Karigi Kithumbu listed as the petitioner. 
Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize

Chief Justice Martha Koome/FILE

Chief Justice Martha Koome has directed that an election petition challenging the Mbeere North parliamentary results be heard at the Embu High Court.

In a gazette notice dated December 5, the directive, made under section 75 of the Elections Act, 2011 and Rule 6(3) of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017, assigned the matter to the Election Court presided over by Justice Richard Mwongo.

The petition, filed as Election Petition No. E1 of 2025, has Julieta Karigi Kithumbu listed as the petitioner.

The respondents named in the case include Patrick Gitonga Gichoni, Leonard Wamuthende, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), and the Mbeere North Constituency Returning Officer.

According to the schedule released by the Office of the Chief Justice, the case concerns the election of the Member of the National Assembly for Mbeere North Constituency.

Details of the petition, as outlined in the notice, indicate that the matter falls within the jurisdiction of the High Court, which is mandated to hear and determine parliamentary election disputes.

“In exercise of the powers conferred by section 75 of the Elections Act, 2011 and Rule 6(3) of the Elections (Parliamentary and County Elections) Petition Rules, 2017, the Chief Justice of the Republic of Kenya directs that the election petition whose details are given hereunder shall be heard in the Election Court comprising of the Judge listed and sitting at the court station indicated,” the notice reads.

Parliamentary election petitions are required by law to be concluded within strict timelines, typically within six months of filing, to ensure certainty in representation and adherence to constitutional requirements.

The assignment of a specific judge and court station marks the formal commencement of judicial proceedings in the dispute, paving the way for pre-trial conferences and subsequent hearings.

Two voters from Mbeere North, Julieta Karigi and Patrick Gitonga, earlier filed a petition at the Embu High Court challenging the election of United Democratic Alliance (UDA) candidate Leo Wa Muthende Njeru.

The petitioners are seeking to have the election nullified and a fresh poll conducted, and they have requested that their petition, dated December 1, 2025, be certified urgent.

The petitioners allege inconsistencies in the candidate’s identity, claiming he was not a registered voter at the time of the election.

They note that on September 3, 2024, the UDA candidate executed a deed poll renouncing his former name, Leonard Muriuki Njeru, and legally adopting the name Leo Wa Muthende Njeru.

They argue that the Constitution allows only duly registered voters to contest for parliamentary seats.

“The first respondent was declared the purported winner of the Mbeere North by-election under the name Leo Wa Muthende Njeru, which doesn’t appear in the register of voters. The only name registered in the electoral roll is Leonard Muriuki Njeru, which the respondent had previously denounced,” the voters stated in their affidavit.

They added that this renders him ineligible for election to the National Assembly.

“The declaration of the first respondent as the winner under a name not registered in the electoral roll renders the election outcome unlawful, invalid and void, constituting a matter of urgent public importance requiring immediate intervention of the court.”

The affidavit further claims that despite the legally valid deed poll, the candidate submitted nomination papers under his former name.

 

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT