President William Ruto is scheduled to undertake
his highly anticipated tour of the Mount Kenya
region this week.
To hear the man Ruto says he had nothing to
do with his impeachment, one can only conclude as far
as the man and the people of Mt Kenya are concerned,
Ruto is akin to persona non grata in the region - not
just because he led his brigade to jettison former
Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua from office - but
for “betraying the Agikuyu community”.
As the man puts it, the community can forgive
almost anything but cannot forgive betrayal.
This is an
interesting observation, which may not hold up when
subject to any scrutiny. For one, betrayal is so intertwined
with politics that it is impossible to imagine where it has
not been present.
As we will soon find out, Ruto may not be that
politically finished or damaged beyond repair as
Gachagua and others may lead one to believe. ere
are several points which lead to this conclusion:
First, there is the power of incumbency.
Any sitting
President wields not just enormous executive powers
to dole both benefits and punishment as he chooses,
he also has access to state resources to do anything he
pleases to advance his political objectives, ill-advised and
detrimental to the larger good for society as that may be.
You can count on the President to unleash regional and
county commissioners as well as Members of Parliament
and MCAs aligned to him from the region to whip up
crowds - not on roadsides as is typically the case - but to
troop to Sagana Lodge and pay homage with the message
being “all is okay; [pick your favorite nickname] is here
to stay and will be reelected mpende msipende (like it
or not).
Second, to do this requires something many will say
Mt Kenya can eff ectively deploy - and that is money.
The
late President Daniel Moi used to brag that he could buy
any votes he wanted in Parliament for 100 bob each. Moi
was talking about the general electorate.
The new thing — well, not all that new as this
catapulted to high gear during the late Mwai Kibaki’s
presidency — which has only gotten progressively worse,
is buying MP votes for ridiculous amounts, no different
than Moi bragging to pay only Sh100 for a vote.
One can therefore imagine those trooping to Sagana
Lodge will either have pockets padded before or after—
and this is not something subject to any debate.
Keep in mind Ruto need not have masses showing up
at the lodge or wherever else he may choose to safely
make a stop; rather, the President and his planners
merely need to show he has some support in the region
and that is good enough to counter the narrative that he
is politically fi nished and will be a walk-over, come 2027.
The third reason the power of incumbency will always
tramp anything on its way, is inability of the opposition
to respond in kind or otherwise.
Whatever Ruto does in Mt Kenya, it will accomplish
his main political objective, and that is, to show the
country and specifically the people of the region who
have written him off, that he is no pushover and defeating
him will take more than one region hating him.
Put another way, Ruto will be telling the region he is
no Raila, who they hated and refused to vote for, to the
man and woman—well, almost to the man and woman
but in large numbers to deny him the presidency even
as he was being rigged out elsewhere.
Ruto need not carry Mt Kenya en masse as he did in
2022 to avoid being denied a second term—a rare fit.
Rather, he just needs a respectable showing, more like
Raila used to garner in the region with the difference
being that Ruto can use that to ride to victory while Raila
could not.
That being the case, those poised or intent to have
Ruto as a one-term president have their work cut out for them.