As a journalist who has worked in various roles, from reporter to sub-editor and editor, I can confidently say that one of the most tedious positions I've held is that of a sub-editor. In fact, I disliked it so much that I requested to be transferred to a different position after a short period of time. It's like being the engine of a story, tirelessly working to make sense out of a reporter's ‘clueless’ draft before sending it to the editor for final review.
Yet, all too often, the sub-editor's efforts go unrecognised, overshadowed by the praise from the reporter for producing a good piece. It's a role where you toil behind the scene, separating the trash from the grain without receiving the acknowledgement you deserve.
Sub-editors, unfortunately, are often quickly apprehended when a headline contains a mistake. They are labelled as lazy sub-editors in just two simple words. While it's true that mistakes can happen, it's time to look at the bigger picture.
Sub-editing is a challenging task that requires immense attention to detail and a deep understanding of storytelling. It's a role that often goes unappreciated, and it's about time we change that perception. There is one sub-editor friend I have who I value immensely for his skill and attention to detail. To this day, I seek his help to edit my own pieces because of how good he is at his work.
In today’s media landscape, one term that is frequently used but seldom understood is "digital disruption." Even some media managers find themselves grappling with its implications. But I understand their confusion because this monster constantly morphs, transforming how we consume news and information. However, like a doubting Thomas during the times of Jesus, I believe we must persevere and witness the results for ourselves.
This disruption has forced most media houses to adapt and change. The majority now prioritise publishing content on digital platforms before appearing in print, radio, or TV. This shift has placed sub-editors at the forefront of everything. They are now ensuring that the stories are well-crafted, coherent and ready for consumption by audiences hungry for information on digital platforms.
Unfortunately, this disruption has come with its casualties. Many journalists have found themselves jobless, while others have been burdened with an increased workload. Among those most affected are the sub-editors, who often find themselves doing the work of editors. They are the new heroes of newsrooms, grappling with the pressure to meet deadlines while preserving the integrity and quality of the stories they handle.
I remember subbing a story for a writer who was furious with me for changing his work. He complained to the editor, accusing me of not doing justice to his stories. A few months later, that same journalist received an award for the same story I meticulously subbed. There were no accolades for me then. I realised then that I had expected too much, but seeing my efforts go unnoticed was disheartening.
Folks, we need to have an honest and open discussion about sub-editors. They deserve recognition for their work, dedication and the vigorous role they play in shaping the stories we consume. It's time to acknowledge that without their attention to detail, many stories would lack coherence and impact. They are the guardians of quality journalism in the current dispensation, ensuring the news we receive is accurate, well-structured and engaging.
Sub-editors play a major role in ensuring the quality and integrity of news articles. They deserve recognition, fair compensation and media awards that highlight their invaluable contributions. It is time to appreciate their work and dedication and ensure that their voices are heard in the ongoing transformation of the media industry.
Nairobi-based journalist
