In Summary
• The court referred to “President Uhuru Kenyatta” in the very first line of the judgment, and to “the President” very many times.
• When discussing whether he can be sued in his personal capacity they used his name not his title – because it is the conduct of Mr Kenyatta that would be in issue. Why is this disrespectful? The rush to protest is obsequious.
Sub judice? I was in two minds over writing about this this week. After all there is a case before the Court of Appeal: the Attorney General and others asking the court to suspend the effect of the ...