
Types of Workplace Gender Differences
What respondents reported in a survey in select countries
Rumour mills inform staff better than leaders but can be toxic if allowed to prevail

Audio By Vocalize

“Kevin has resigned.”
The news didn’t come through an official memo. It moved like an electric current through the rows of desks. By the 10am tea break, the kitchenette was packed. Steam from plastic cups of tea curled into a thick cloud of speculation.
“It must have been a disciplinary case,” a senior associate whispered, leaning in. “I heard he was pushed out.” The murmurs gained momentum. Kevin had indeed left.
In Kevin's office, and in many other spaces, gossip isn’t just a distraction. It’s a system.
Employees become active participants in an informal network where information is currency. They don’t wait for news; they seek it out, refine it and redistribute it.
Sometimes, they go as far as amplifying the most damaging versions of a story, especially when the subject is absent. But this isn’t just idle chatter; it’s a powerful social mechanism.
INFO CATALYST
A landmark study done in 2020 across 142 Kenyan communities by researchers from MIT and Harvard found that so-called ‘gossip hubs’ are highly effective at spreading information, more so than formal leaders.
When information was seeded through the grapevine, it spread 22 per cent more widely.
In Kevin’s office, these ‘hubs’ were already at work, not just sharing information but shaping it. And in a context where family and social standing are deeply intertwined, the consequences go far beyond the workplace.
A rumour doesn’t just threaten a career, it can destabilise a person’s reputation, relationships and sense of belonging. As the day wears on, the cost becomes visible, especially for those at the centre of the whispers.
This is where resource depletion sets in. Being the subject of negative gossip drains mental and emotional energy. The constant pressure of defending one’s reputation, whether directly or silently, leaves fewer resources for actual work.
The study notes that focus slips. Productivity declines. Confidence erodes. And it doesn’t stop at the office door.
Through what psychologists describe as ‘crossover effects’, workplace stress travels home. The tension carried from the office seeps into family life, conversations at the dinner table an interactions with spouses and children. What began as a rumour at work becomes a strain on relationships at home.
Yet, not everyone is equally affected.
“Babe, why do people keep saying that I was thrown out of my job? I thought I just resigned because I was tired. I feel like the world is eating me alive,” Kevin tells his spouse as he heads home.
The happenings of the day continue weighing down on him. But in a corner of the office, a small team keeps the rumour mill alive with quiet confidence.
The gossipmongers appear insulated not because they are unaware but because they feel supported. This is the power of perceived organisational support.
When employees believe their organisation values and protects them, they are better equipped to withstand stress. Their emotional reserves recover faster. The impact of gossip is softened. Even the spillover into family life is reduced.
The story of Kevin is not just about resignation. It is a reminder that workplace gossip, often dismissed as harmless, has real and measurable consequences. It shapes performance, relationships and well-being both inside and outside the office.
Gossip can rarely be eliminated. The question, then, is what kind of environment allows it to thrive, and what kind of leadership can limit its harm.
BUILDING SAFEGUARDS
While leaders may not be able to stop the whispers, they can build organisations strong enough that those whispers do not break the people within them.
Psychologist Carol Joy tells the Star that gossip thrives in a vacuum. When official information is withheld in workplaces, employees use gossip to fill in the blanks, thus incubating this behaviour.
“This behaviour is usually driven by the desire to connect socially or decipher work ambiguity,” she says.
“It stems from boredom and individual insecurity. The gossiper tends to feel 'valued' by his or her listeners.”
Joy says gossiping is rarely a mental issue, but malicious gossiping stems from deep-seated insecurities, narcissistic traits or even high anxiety.
“This behaviour makes them happy, temporarily, as it triggers a dopamine release in the brain of the gossiper, giving them a sense of importance, group belonging and superiority over their subject,” she says.
People engage in workplace gossip even when they know it can be harmful because humans are wired to gossip as a survival mechanism.
“For most people, the feeling of being included and powerful, even though short-term, overrides the logic of the kind of harm it could cause others,” she says.
But she says that gossip is not negative but “pro-social”.
“if it serves to warn new employees of a toxic manager, explain unwritten workplace rules, enforce group norms and protect the new staff themselves, then it serves a protective purpose,” she says.
UNDERLYING ISSUES
Joy sees workplace gossip as a symptom of deeper organisational issues rather than harmless chatter.
“Issues such as poor management, high competition among workers, poor communication and lack of transparency are breeders of gossip in workplaces,” she explains.
In some cases, it thrives simply out of boredom: “Idleness at work creates boredom, and most people welcome anything that’ll feel like social bonding.”
She also points to blurred boundaries as a factor: “Blurred lines between staff and management brings a sort of familiarity that dilutes proper communication and correction.”
The impact on the person being gossiped about can be profound.
“This form of social rejection activates
the same brain regions as physical pain,” Joy says, adding that because it
happens behind their backs, “they feel powerless and unable to defend
themselves”.
She describes it as a “social threat” that can be hard to ignore.
That stress doesn’t stay at work. “As
humans, we struggle to separate our work and personal lives,” she says.
The result can be anxiety, irritability and poor sleep, which may affect relationships at home. “The hyper-alertness of being in a toxic work environment may cause them to withdraw or lash out,” she adds.
This is unsustainable. “Gossip erodes trust and leads to paranoia, high turnover and reduced productivity,” she says.
It also affects the gossiper. “They may experience paranoia, cynicism and anxiety about being exposed.”
Joy believes leadership plays a critical role in stopping the cycle. She urges management to address the matter transparently.
“That gossip is ‘harmless tea time talk’ is a misconception,” she says. “It can damage an individual's mental health and an organisation's culture.”
To curb it, she emphasises open
communication and safety.
“Employees should address grievances directly, and organisations must create psychological safety without fear of retaliation,” Joy says.

What respondents reported in a survey in select countries

“I was not abducted. I’m not sick"