Mozambique was the site of one of Africa’s in recent times. In the year 2000 floods killed 700 people, displaced 60,000, and left more than 500,000 needing humanitarian assistance.
The disaster also totalling over US$273 million – that’s six times Mozambique’s GDP.
Unfortunately, neither the citizens nor the government had disaster insurance. This meant that the country had to seek donations and humanitarian aid to rebuild. At the time, Mozambique’s economy was already constrained by poverty and low levels of social development. So the aftermath of the floods was another blow to the economy.
Compare this to the 2010 earthquake that devastated Christchurch in New Zealand. There, of the losses were covered by disaster insurance. This ensured a quick , and reduced the economic burden on both the government and the people.
These two scenarios demonstrate the importance of . Current global estimates suggest that over are susceptible to natural disasters.
Between 2006 and 2015 the damage caused by disasters cost Africa . Global estimates of the same damage costs have nearly doubled in 2017 from .
Insurance is one way that citizens and governments can mitigate against the damage caused by natural disasters. But in Sub-Saharan Africa the uptake of such insurance remains low. This is surprising given the increased threat large parts of the continent face from climate related hazards and the extreme economic losses that may be incurred.
So what are the factors underpinning this lack of demand for disaster insurance? They include risk assessment, access to information, and the affordability of premiums.
Disaster insuranceis an agreement between an insurance company and a nation state, body corporate, or individual that entitles them to compensation for losses incurred during disasters. For that entitlement, a cash premium is paid every month.
The seminal works of academics and were among the first to assess the role of insurance in disaster recovery. They were both concerned with how to mitigate the effects of disaster losses.
Kunreuther argued that insurance was a potent tool in mitigating disasters by securing recovery funds for disaster victims. Hirschleifer contended that insurance would secure resources for urgent problems and ensure faster recovery for those affected. Both advocated for insurance as a way of building up the cash reserves that would be needed in the long-term management of disasters.
Despite these studied and stated benefits, the demand for disaster insurance in Sub-Saharan Africa remains critically low. Only of consumers have disaster insurance. An of those are in South Africa. Why is this the case?
Traditional literature such as poor insurance education. But insights from – the process of economic decision-making – indicate that the problem may be elsewhere.
Behavioural economicsBehavioural has consistently shown that individuals . In the context of the threat of natural disasters, the rational thing would be to prevent economic losses by insuring one’s assets.
And yet this isn’t how people behave in this case. While suggests that for the low uptake by ordinary citizens this is only part of the problem.
An individual’s attitude towards risk, together with a lack of information, are also likely to play a significant role in insurance uptake. While the general population is considered to be slightly risk averse, individuals who are risk neutral or risk averse are less inclined to be insured. This is compounded by the from a potential disaster: for instance, the further away a person is from a disaster site, the safer they’ll feel.
also shows that general understanding of insurance products and disaster probability is limited. Finally, is key. Individuals if they do not believe support will be provided when it’s needed. As such, the relationship between consumers and insurers is very important for boosting demand.
Future policy considerationsTo solve the sub-Saharan African insurance problem, our research indicates that a raft of coordinated policies should be implemented to ensure a net increase in demand for disaster insurance.
Behavioural insights suggest that policies should be directed at influencing individual decision-making processes by removing barriers such as , mistrust and prohibitive costs.
Mandatory disaster insurance is another option; it would broaden the insurance pool, spread the risk and lower individual premiums – making insurance affordable to the average citizen.
By
, Casual Academics and PhD Candidate, School of Architecture and Built Environment, ; , Senior Lecturer Behavioural Economics , Newcastle Business School, ; , , ; , Research fellow, ; , Assistant Professor, Division of Global Architecture, Graduate School of Engineering, , and , Associate professor,
This article was originally published on . Read the .
