logo
ADVERTISEMENT
News06 July 2026 - 00:49

CoB queries emergency budget powers after Sh144bn used to settle sovereign debt, daily operations

77 per cent of recurrent Exchequer issues was directed towards public debt

image
by ELIUD KIBII
Vocalize Pre-Player Loader

Audio By Vocalize



Controller of Budget Margaret Nyakang'o 
The government used constitutional emergency spending powers to pay more than Sh144 billion towards international sovereign bond obligations during the first nine months of the current financial year, a new report has established.

The National Government Budget Implementation Review Report for the First Nine Months of FY2025-26 by the Controller of Budget finds that “increased reliance on supplementary expenditure under Article 223 of the Constitution” is one of the key challenges affecting budget implementation, alongside delays in procurement and the accumulation of pending bills.

The report reveals that 77 per cent of the recurrent Exchequer issues, equivalent to Sh144.40 billion, was directed towards public debt for the settlement of international sovereign bonds.

This prompts fresh questions by the Controller of Budget over the growing reliance on Article 223 of the Constitution.

Of the approved amount, the Controller of Budget authorised withdrawals totalling Sh206.81 billion, with recurrent expenditure accounting for Sh185.34 billion.

While the Constitution permits additional expenditure where approved allocations are insufficient or unforeseen needs arise, the Controller warns that the increasing use of Article 223 raises broader questions about adherence to its intended purpose.

Article 223 permits the national government to spend unappropriated money where an existing budget is insufficient, unforeseen needs arise or money is withdrawn from the Contingencies Fund.

The report shows the National Treasury approved Sh276.76 billion in additional expenditure under Article 223 between July 2025 and March 2026, comprising Sh207.99 billion for recurrent expenditure and Sh68.77 billion for development spending.

The approvals represented six per cent of the national budget and remained within the constitutional ceiling of 10 per cent.

However, the amount approved under the emergency provision was more than five times the Sh48.88 billion approved during the same period in the previous financial year.

It is, however, the nature of the spending that has raised concern at the Office of the Controller of Budget.

“The Controller of Budget observed that some of the approvals under Article 223 of the Constitution were routine in nature, intended to support day-to-day office operations,” the report says.

It adds that the office sought explanations from accounting officers on whether the expenditure complied with the Public Finance Management (National Government) Regulations, including whether the spending was foreseeable and whether it ought to have been provided for during the preparation of the 2025-26 Budget Estimates.

The findings show that some ministries resorted to emergency constitutional provisions to finance expenditure that ordinarily ought to have been included in the annual budget approved by Parliament.

The report also provides examples of how the emergency allocations were used.

State House received an additional Sh4.45 billion under Article 223, noting that “the over-expenditure on Coordination of State House Functions sub-programme was attributable to additional funding of Sh4.45 billion under Article 223 of the Constitution in favour of the State House for other operating expenses.”

Similarly, the report says the Deputy President Services programme recorded overexpenditure... attributable to additional funding of Sh507.84 million under Article 223 to cater for hospitality supplies and services, hire of transport and other operating expenses.

The report also found that the National Intelligence Service exceeded its approved budget after receiving emergency funding, spending Sh53.93 billion on recurrent activities.

Security agencies were also among the major beneficiaries. The report says the State Department for Internal Security and National Administration exceeded its recurrent budget after receiving Sh8.09 billion under Article 223, while “the National Government Coordination Services sub-programme surpassed its budget by 32 per cent... utilised for security-related operations”.

The Controller’s findings come against the backdrop of mounting debt-servicing pressures facing the government.

According to the report, the public debt stood at Sh12.82 trillion by March 2026, representing 69.9 per cent of GDP, well above Parliament’s approved debt anchor of 55 per cent.

During the first nine months of the financial year, debt servicing alone consumed Sh1.35 trillion, with the increase largely attributed to principal repayments on external debt.

The report further notes that the government has increasingly relied on liability management operations, including the buyback of international sovereign bonds financed through the issuance of new Eurobonds, as part of efforts to reduce refinancing risks and smooth debt maturities.

Even so, the emergency spending was not confined to debt and government operations.

The report shows Article 223 funding was also used to facilitate the 2025 national examinations, the Joint Mobile Registration Outreach Programme for national identity cards and birth certificates.

Other initiatives are the Health Internship Programme, the Kenya Covid-19 Health Emergency Response Project, drought intervention, milk mop-up to stabilise raw milk prices, the Nyota youth empowerment programme and the Dongo Kundu Special Economic Zone Project.

The State Department for Special Programmes received Sh5.61 billion under Article 223 “for purchase of essential food items for drought intervention in the country”, while the State Department for Co-operatives received Sh2 billion for “milk mop-up of excess milk” to stabilise raw milk prices.

Although the Controller does not say the government breached the Constitution, she warns that there is “over-reliance on Article 223 of the Constitution to fund government programmes and settlement of debt obligations”, identifying it as one of the key fiscal challenges affecting budget implementation.

To restore the constitutional intent of the provision, Nyakang’o recommends that “requisitions under Article 223 of the Constitution should be applied strictly in line with the requirements on use of Article 223, which are unforeseen and of an emergent nature.”

The report further calls for a review of the legislative framework governing Article 223 and stronger control mechanisms to safeguard fiscal integrity and enhance budget transparency.

 


ADVERTISEMENT
logo

Follow us:
© The Star 2026. All rights reserved