
The Office of the Speaker of the National Assembly has come out strongly against a media report questioning Speaker Moses Wetang’ula’s impartiality and political affiliations.
In a detailed press statement released on Saturday, the Speaker's Press Unit described the article as misleading and unfair, accusing it of attempting to "undermine public confidence in the institution of Parliament."
The story in question, published in a weekend edition, suggested that Wetang’ula’s political engagement compromises his neutrality in the House. But the Speaker’s office rejected the claims, calling them “deeply skewed” and “speculative.”
"The story presents a deeply skewed narrative that unfairly questions the integrity and commitment of the Speaker," the statement said.
According to the Speaker’s office, Wetang’ula’s role is anchored in the Constitution, which does not bar the Speaker from holding political party membership or leadership, so long as impartiality in the House is maintained.
“Nowhere does the Constitution bar the Speaker from retaining membership or leadership of a political party,” the statement noted, adding that Wetang’ula has always presided over parliamentary proceedings with “distinction.”
The statement further said that the Speaker had consistently demonstrated fairness and neutrality in the conduct of House business.
“In practice, Speaker Wetang’ula has repeatedly demonstrated firm commitment to the principles of neutrality, fairness, and decorum.”
The press unit dismissed the portrayal of Wetang’ula as a “campaigner” or “partisan actor” as not only misleading, but as an attack on his credibility and long-standing public service.
The Speaker’s continued involvement with Ford Kenya and his political presence in the Western Kenya region, according to the statement, are not unconstitutional.
“Speaker Wetang’ula retains the right, enshrined in our democratic order, to engage with his constituents, articulate regional aspirations, and offer leadership in political discourse outside the formal sittings of the House,” the office said.
The statement also challenged the interpretation of a recent High Court ruling referenced in the article, cautioning against politicising the Judiciary.
“It is critical to note that the ruling does not in any way invalidate Speaker Wetang’ula’s service to the National Assembly or diminish his capacity to preside impartially.”
The Speaker’s office maintained that Wetang’ula remains committed to democratic governance and the rule of law.
“The attempt to brand his dedicated service as ‘erosion of integrity’ is not only inaccurate but also unfairly discredits decades of principled leadership in public life.”
The Speaker's office also urged media houses to adhere to professional standards when reporting on constitutional offices.
“We urge members of the media to exercise responsibility, accuracy, and fairness in reporting on matters of national leadership.”
The statement closed by affirming Wetang’ula’s unwavering commitment to impartiality, integrity, and service.
“Speaker Wetang’ula will continue to discharge his duties guided by the Constitution, the Standing Orders, and the enduring principles of impartiality, integrity, and service to the nation.”