Close

JUST ELIMINATE HARM

Tobacco harm reduction: Why not eliminate?

E-cigarettes, pouches are a gateway to tobacco use and are not a safer alternative

In Summary

•“Harm reduction” is not a new strategy. Industry actors argue that cigarette filters and filter perforations are designed so as to block out chemicals such as tar and nicotine.

•We should go for “Harm Elimination”, which is possible through effective implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC)

A person vapes from an e-cigarette. Study finds that bacteria associated with lung cancer are made more virulent by exposure to vapour from e-cigarettes.
LUNG INFLAMMATION: A person vapes from an e-cigarette. Study finds that bacteria associated with lung cancer are made more virulent by exposure to vapour from e-cigarettes.
Image: COURTESY

Tobacco use remains the greatest preventable cause of death globally killing up to half of all its users.

It is known for being the leading risk factor for most non-communicable diseases including heart disease and cancer. There are over 7000 chemicals present in tobacco smoke and among these, at least 250 are known to be harmful and at least 69 are known to be carcinogenic (World Health Organization).

Nicotine, one of these chemicals, is the addictive substance in tobacco and has hooked over 1.1 billion smokers globally among which 80% live in low-and middle-income countries.

Given that tobacco kills up to half of its users, it does not come as a surprise when World Health Organization estimates (July 2019) that about 8 million people die globally every year due to tobacco consumption.

 

Tobacco control has for the longest time fought the prevalence of tobacco use and exposure to second-hand smoking through prevention and treatment. These efforts have however been frustrated repeatedly by the tobacco industry which continues to come up with new and innovative ways to prevail the market; the latest of which is the introduction of the so called “harm reduction” products.

A leading cigarette manufacture in Kenya has announced plans to build a Sh2,5 billion plant to manufacture nicotine pouches, one such product. 

“Harm reduction” is not a new strategy. Industry actors argue that cigarette filters and filter perforations are designed so as to block out chemicals such as tar and nicotine.

IT'S BETTER TO ELIMINATE

More often than not, e-cigarettes and pouches serve as a gateway to cigarette/ tobacco use and not as a safer alternative.  Our regulatory systems are weak and unable to contain these products strictly as prescribed drugs (as is the case in the West). We need to be worried. 

However, the impact is insignificant as smokers draw harder from the cigarettes and cover the holes to compensate. Nicotine based products are now common in the form of pouches and Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) also known as e- cigarettes.

Following intense industry marketing, these products are now popular around the world, for instance, in the USA, e-cigarettes were used by over 3.6 million middle and high school going children in the year 2018, prompting a raft of regulatory measures including ban of use in indoor and public spaces, disclosure of ingredients, packaging and their marketing. Even with these measures, deaths were reported after an outbreak of a lung illness associated with vaping/ e- cigarette use.

There are still mixed feelings about Tobacco Harm Reduction (THR) with one school of thought supporting it on grounds that smokers hold a right to choose to use ‘less harmful’ forms of nicotine and no ban should be imposed upon these products.

On the other hand, those opposing argue that use of the ‘less harmful’ forms of nicotine may deter people willing to stop smoking from quitting while exposing them to other unintended harm health wise.

In Africa, smoking prevalence is growing and effects on public health is dire. “Harm reduction” products such as e-cigarettes are becoming increasingly popular with our youth, thanks to the power of social media advertising.

More often than not, they serve as a gateway to cigarette/ tobacco use and not as a safer alternative.  Our regulatory systems are weak and unable to contain these products strictly as prescribed drugs (as is the case in the West). We need to be worried. 

 

The World Health Organization advises that there is still no consensus on the effectiveness of “Harm reduction” strategies. More research is therefore needed from independent, public health- driven sources.

Industry driven “Harm reduction” strategies have a narrow approach and are meant to drive the interest of the industry to make profits through sale of alternative products(including nicotine pouches and Electronic cigarettes) in the wake of tightening regulation on tobacco products around the world.

Rather than call for “harm Reduction” we should be arguing for “Harm Elimination”, which is possible through effective implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC), our Tobacco Control Act 2007.

 Emma Wanyonyi is the CEO of International Institute for Legislative Affairs, while Elizabeth Mbugua works in the policy development programme