All Kenyans must follow court orders, Maraga says after Miguna drama

Chief Justice David Maraga presides before delivering the ruling on the presidential election at the Supreme Court in Nairobi, September 1, 2017. /Reuters
Chief Justice David Maraga presides before delivering the ruling on the presidential election at the Supreme Court in Nairobi, September 1, 2017. /Reuters

Disobeying court orders is

inimical to the rule of law, Chief Justice David Maraga has said.

Maraga spoke on Wednesday

after

IG Joseph Boinnet and DCI George Kinoti defied orders to release lawyer Miguna Miguna from police custody.

Related:

"Magistrates and judges have liberty to

invoke legal avenues available to enforce orders," Maraga noted in a statement.

"The recent disregard

of court orders

is an act that

is not only inimical to the rule of law but also completely at odds with Kenyans' constitutional rights."

The CJ added that compliance with court orders is not an option for any individual or institution.

"Neither is it a favour

to be doled out to the judiciary. Rather, it is a crucial

matter of constitutional and civic obligation."

Maraga noted all state officers took an oath of office to protect and uphold the constitution so disobeying it will attract

penalties.

"To disobey a court order is not only a violation of the constitution

but also dereliction

of public duty," he said.

He noted courts

are "temples of justice and places of refuge" for those seeking protection.

"They must never be despoiled

ether through acts of physical transgressions or blatant

disregard of their pronouncements."

Maraga assured Kenyans that the judiciary will

continue to dispense its constitutional

duty with independence and authority.

"We will ensure the rule of law, justice, good governance

and equality are entrenched through our courts."

After spending several nights in police cells, Miguna was forced into a plane to Canada on Tuesday night.

Despite a directive requiring Miguna to be taken to court, Interior CS Fred Matiang'i, in a move that clearly pit the executive against the judiciary, ordered that the lawyer remains in custody.

This was while frantic plans to have him removed from the courtly were being made.

Matiang’i, in a declaration that Miguna was a prohibited immigrant, said his directive was "sufficient warrant for police to keep Miguna in custody".

More on this:

Also read:

WATCH: The latest videos from the Star