The relationship between a bank and its customers has changed a great deal in the past few years. From a time when paperwork and bureaucracy was the order of the day, to a time when technology is now enabling faster, more focused transactions, banking has changed in a way that has been of benefit to the customer. There is yet another revolution underway, as well. The customer is no longer just an anonymous number. We are nearly at a stage where products and services are tailored for the individual customer. We are close to being able to now create products, price them, and offer them to customers at an individual level.
At the same time, the growing complexity of financial products, and the entire financial industry, has meant that regulation has had to follow suit. Even as new products and new ways of selling them have been developed, banking still needs to be as solid, trustworthy and safe as it has always been, perhaps even more so. The lessons the world painfully absorbed in the aftermath of the 2007-08 financial crisis brought home the fact that regulation as had been carried out prior to this had not served customers, banks, the economy and society as well as it should have. In the decade since, this realisation has led to the review of accounting standards to create a more resilient and stable banking sector.
One of the most significant changes in this arsenal is a new reporting standard that will come into effect on 1st January 2018 across the globe. International Financial Reporting Standard 9, or IFRS 9, was developed in response to the global financial crisis to help ensure financial institutions recognise and account for risk more prudently. The standard was issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB), for which compliance is a regulatory requirement in the Kenya Companies Act 2015.
IFRS 9 is the accounting standard that deals with accounting for financial instruments such as loans and advances, customer deposits, government securities, cash, borrowings, other debtors and creditors. The standard guides the classification and measurement, impairment and hedging of these financial instruments.
While IFRS 9 may sound quite complicated and esoteric, it is quite, at its core, very simple. The fundamental change introduced by the standard is on recognition of credit risk losses. Credit risk is the risk that a borrower will default on their contractual obligation to repay a loan. Traditionally, a bank (or any other financial institution offering credit products) has recognised a loan’s risk at the point of default. Under IFRS 9, banks will be expected to provide for things that are expected to happen in future.
IFRS 9 now requires that these institutions recognise this risk at the beginning and during the entire loan’s credit life cycle. In this case, a better understanding of the borrower’s credit profile, industry, the current and expected macro-economic environment will be important determinants of how to score, measure and price for risk.
Impairment is a measure of risk attributable to the cash flows that an entity may fail to realise in the event of a default. It is a factor of the customers probability of default over a specified time horizon, the expected exposure at default and the loss given default for the cash flows not recovered.
Additionally IFRS 9 introduces a new requirement of calculating credit risk associated with undrawn or unutilised but committed credit facilities reported as off balance sheet exposures. These includes, credit and overdraft limits, letters of credit, performance and financial guarantees. Further, the standard introduces a requirement to hold credit allowances for government securities previously not in scope for impairment. This comes in the wake of sovereign risk default witnessed during the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
By analysing, recognising and allocating this risk throughout the life cycle of the loan, financial institutions will be able to tell, at a glance, how much risk their loan books carry, and allocate their resources accordingly.
IFRS 9 substantially changes the rules on provisions for impairment, which will in turn mean significant changes for the customer. The one that the consumer will notice the most will be the introduction of cross-product default. Instead of looking at each facility the customer has – credit card, mortgage, personal loan – in isolation, IFRS 9 will mean that we will have one customer, and default on one product will mean banks have to impair the other products the customer has.
So why does IFRS 9 matter to you? It goes back to what we started with, and the revolution in the information and data, pricing and customer engagement we manage with you. IFRS 9’s demands on the risk modelling and pricing of credit products bring these revolutions full-circle. Banks and other institutions will now have to know their customers and their financial profiles a lot better, in order to more efficiently allocate risks and minimise forward looking expected impairment and provisioning.
Theoretically, IFRS 9 should mean better pricing for lower-risk customers, as the bank will have a far greater amount of information on each customer, and will have the ability to create a big data analysis model around that customer. However, the introduction of the interest rate caps in the Kenyan market forces the same price on customers, regardless of risk, and it means that we are thus unable to segment the market and offer better pricing for less risky customers. The net result is that we are potentially looking at a further contraction to private sector lending which will impact economic growth. It is therefore important for the government and industry players to come together and review the impact of the Banking Amendment Act (2016) in light of the impending IFRS 9 rules and make the necessary adjustments to the law so as to release much needed capital flow to deserving businesses in order to stimulate economic growth.
IFRS 9 also demands a different relationship between the banking sector and regulators. The first and most obvious is that with the body mandated to maintain accounting standards in Kenya, the Institute for Certified Public Accountants in Kenya. ICPAK is working with relevant industry players to translate the varied requirements under IFRS 9 to the Kenyan situation.
The Central Bank of Kenya, is also reviewing its position in view of the requirements under IFRS 9. Issues including capital ratio requirements, which are directly under the CBK’s purview, are part of this review and we expect the CBK to communicate its view in due course. Other institutions such as the Kenya Revenue Authority are also crucial to this. Since the core of IFRS 9 – the recognition and allocation of risk – does mean changes to a bank’s balance sheet as well as profit and loss position. How KRA translates its reporting requirements to the industry will be key to the success of the rollout of IFRS from January.
In summary the objective of this Standard is to establish principles for the financial reporting of financial assets and financial liabilities that will present relevant and useful information to users of financial statements for their assessment of the amounts, timing and uncertainty of an entity’s future cash flows. Ultimately, the introduction of IFRS 9 on 1 January, 2018 will change the global banking landscape and introduce a new normal for the sector.
Jeremy Awori, Managing Director, Barclays Bank of Kenya
- Thank you for participating in discussions on The Star, Kenya website. You are welcome to comment and debate issues, however take note that:
- Comments that are abusive; defamatory; obscene; promote or incite violence, terrorism, illegal acts, hate speech, or hatred on the grounds of race, ethnicity, cultural identity, religious belief, disability, gender, identity or sexual orientation, or are otherwise objectionable in the Star’s reasonable discretion shall not be tolerated and will be deleted.
- Comments that contain unwarranted personal abuse will be deleted.
- Strong personal criticism is acceptable if justified by facts and arguments.
- Deviation from points of discussion may lead to deletion of comments.
- Failure to adhere to this policy and guidelines may lead to blocking of offending users. Our moderator’s decision to block offending users is final.