The Court of Appeal has dismissed claims that no appeal was filed on the eve of the repeat election, to set aside a ruling that officials' appointment was illegal.
Registrar Moses Serem confirmed on Thursday that the appeal was filed by Emanuel Wetangula at about 4pm on October 25.
The lawyer who appeared on behalf of the electoral agency paid Sh2,850 before the file was placed before Court of Appeal president Kihara
Kariuki.
Kariuki then assigned Justice Erastus Githinji, Martha Koome and Fatuma Sichale to hear the application filed under a certificate of urgency.
The three judges sat in an open court at around 4.30pm and heard the
ex parte
application before issuing orders setting aside justice
Odunga's
decision.
Odunga had declared that the appointment of returning officers and their deputies was illegal.
Also read:
The judges each had files and made individuals notes.
Lawyer Apollo Mboya sensationally claimed no appeal was filed, contrary to an order sent to newsrooms a few hours before the repeat poll.
"Was the application filed in the Court
of Appeal to stay justice
Odunga's
decision - NO. Was it heard by three judges-
NO. Are judges from Nairobi - No," the lawyer tweeted.
In another tweet, the lawyer went on to say that contrary to rules, a judge of the appeals court gave final orders staying Odunga's decision and sent it for signing by the other two judges.
"The staff of the registry of the Court of Appeal are under pressure to backdate the application filed
post-facto
for
stay
of justice
Odunga’s
decision," reads another tweet.
The appeals judges who lifted Odunga's
judgment
were
of the view that the decision could render the election irregular before it took place.
The judge noted that such a move would "precipitate another election outside 60 days, in contravention of the provisions of Article 140(3) of the Constitution."
They also faulted
Odunga's decision saying the constitution does not expressly give the courts power to alter election dates.